Peer Review Process
All research articles published in Agrovation: Journal of Agricultural Innovation undergo a rigorous peer-review process to ensure scientific validity, high quality, and academic integrity.
Review Model: This journal implements a strict Double-Blind Peer Review policy. The identities of both authors and reviewers are kept anonymous throughout the review process to maintain absolute objectivity.
Review Workflow & Timeline
1. Initial Screening (1 Week): The Editor-in-Chief and Section Editors evaluate the manuscript for structural formatting, scope alignment, and similarity check (plagiarism screening via Turnitin).
2. Peer Review Assignment (3–4 Weeks): Qualified manuscripts are assigned to at least two independent expert reviewers from diverse academic and research institutions.
3. Author Revision (2–3 Weeks): Based on the reviewers' constructive feedback, authors are given time to revise their manuscripts accordingly.
4. Final Editorial Decision: The Editorial Board reviews the revised manuscript and issues a final decision (Accepted, Minor/Major Revision, or Rejected).