Peran Teknologi Dalam Mendukung Produktivitas Dan Kualitas Hidup Masyarakat

Main Article Content

Riska Rismawati
Ade Fricticarani
Muhamad Hakim Abdurrahman

Abstract

The rapid growth of information and communication technology in recent years has significantly changed the daily routines and socio-economic activities of modern society. This quantitative study was conducted to analyze and directly test how the use of information technology influences work productivity efficiency as well as the overall quality of life. Employing an explanatory causal research design, primary data were gathered through structured questionnaires measured on a 5-point Likert scale distributed to 250 respondents. The sample was drawn using a simple random sampling technique across urban and surrounding suburban areas. Prior to hypothesis testing, the research instruments were confirmed to meet valid criteria through item validity testing and Cronbach's Alpha reliability evaluation. A series of classical assumption tests including normality, multicollinearity, and homoscedasticity were also fulfilled to ensure the validity of the multiple linear regression model. 


Inferential data analysis revealed that information technology usage has a positive and significant impact, both simultaneously and partially, on boosting work productivity F=84.12;p<0.001 and improving quality of life F=62.45;p<0.001. Fast access to data and workflow automation emerged as key factors in accelerating daily routines. These findings emphasize that digital devices serve not merely as entertainment or interpersonal communication tools, but as vital supports for work efficiency and personal well-being. Therefore, expanding internet infrastructure and digital literacy programs is necessary to ensure these technological benefits are evenly distributed across all segments of society.


 


Keywords: Information Technology; Work Productivity; Quality of Life.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Peran Teknologi Dalam Mendukung Produktivitas Dan Kualitas Hidup Masyarakat. (2026). JURNAL KEILMUAN TEKNOLOGI DAN PENDIDIKAN TERPADU, 2(1), 12-19. https://doi.org/10.65841/tekdika.v2i1.239

References

Brynjolfsson, E., Rock, D., & Syverson, C. (2021). The productivity J-curve: How intangibles complement general purpose technologies. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 13(1), 333-372. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.20180386

Choirinisa, A. A., & Ikhwan, K. (2022). Pengaruh penggunaan aplikasi digital terhadap efektivitas kerja pegawai. Transekonomika: Akuntansi, Bisnis Dan Keuangan, 2(5), 483-492. https://doi.org/10.55047/transekonomika.v2i5.239

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319-340.

Farmania, A., Elsyah, R. D., & Fortunisa, A. (2022). The phenomenon of technostress during the COVID-19 pandemic due to work from home in Indonesia. Sustainability, 14(14), 8669. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148669

Fauziah, F., Surur, A. A. Z., Kartini, K., Riana, R. I., & Ilmi, N. (2025). Strengthening Public Health Literacy Through Digital and In-Person Educational Campaigns: PENGUATAN LITERASI KESEHATAN MASYARAKAT MELALUI KAMPANYE EDUKASI DIGITAL DAN LURING. GERAKAN EDUKASI DAN MASYARAKAT NUSANTARA, 1(1), 33–39.

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

Hidayat, A. A., & Achjari, D. (2017). Pengaruh Investasi Teknologi Informasi Terhadap Efisiensi Organisasi. Kaji. Bisnis STIE Widya Wiwaha, 25(2), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.32477/jkb.v25i2.133

Pratiwi, A. I. (2025). The Pengaruh Sosialisasi QRIS, Literasi Digital dan Efisiensi Terhadap Penggunaan Uang Elektronik Siswa SMP Negeri 3 Muara Bungo. JURNAL KEILMUAN TEKNOLOGI DAN PENDIDIKAN TERPADU, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.65841/tekdika.v1i1.45

Purborini, V. S., & Suryanatha, I. B. (2025). Inovasi teknologi dalam pemberdayaan masyarakat: Membangun kemandirian dan kesejahteraan. Jurnal Ilmu Politik Dan Studi Sosial Terapan, 4(1), 138-152. https://doi.org/10.65974/jiposster.v4i1.26

Putra, Y. I., Idrus, A., & Firman, F. (2024). Technology and entrepreneurship combine: Shaping an innovative future. Journal of Economics Education and Entrepreneurship, 5(3), 158–164. https://doi.org/10.20527/jee.v5i3.11866

Putra, Y. I., Irawan, D., & Idrus, A. (2026). Offline Internet Innovation: New Opportunities for Entrepreneurs in Remote Districts. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Dan Teknologi Informasi (JIPTI), 7(1), 182–190. https://doi.org/10.52060/jipti.v7i1.3958

Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In Handbook of market research (pp. 587–632). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57413-4_15

Setyadi, H. J., Taruk, M., & Pakpahan, H. S. (2019). Analisis dampak penggunaan teknologi (technostress) kepada dosen dan staff karyawan yang berpengaruh terhadap kinerja di dalam organisasi (Studi kasus: perguruan tinggi di Kalimantan Timur). Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komputer, 14(1), 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.30872/jim.v14i1.1792

Singh, P., Bala, H., Dey, B. L., & Filieri, R. (2022). Enforced remote working: The impact of digital platform-induced stress and remote working experience on technology exhaustion and subjective wellbeing. Journal of Business Research, 151, 269–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.07.002

Taherdoost, H. (2016). Sampling methods in research methodology; how to choose a sampling technique for research. How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research (April 10, 2016). https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205035